As long as you don't expand a small sample 200%+ it sounds really good still.Īgain, I use it mainly for making beats right now but I love audition 1.5 I've noticed a lot of things in it that I use and do that Audition 1 didn't/doesn't have. Plus the new time expansion tool, I couldnt live without.

Looping samples and audio tracks is so simple with 1.5 which I dont think audition 1 or cool edit supports?

i can create things faster with some of the new features and tools. I used cool edit pro 2000 (a tiny bit) and audition 1 (A lot). My reply is that 1.5 DOES have features that you can't live without. And, in my experience, AA 1.5 has been a LOT more stable than CEP 2.0.but then I typically run a fair number of tracks on each song. There are other conveniences and changes that I don't use much, but I like having access to the parametric EQ from Multitrack View. If all you record is guitar/vocal, probably it wouldn't be that big a deal, but with multitracks with alternate takes, the mouse gets old really quickly. I now use Adobe Audition 1.5 with a Mackie Control Universal, and it would be very difficult to go back to using a mouse/keyboard for mixing again. 2.0 would work with the Red Rover (and I had one) but to go from that to a Tascam US428 was a major deal, and required 2.1. Although this was implemented in CEP 2.1, my computer suffered a catastrophic power failure that wiped out everything.and the only software I hadn't saved a copy of was the 2.1 upgrade. Second would be integration with an external controller. This is the only way I have found to remove finger squeaks from acoustic guitar tracks. The upgrade was worth it, just for the single click remover tool.

Adobe cool edit pro 2.0 download